Thursday, July 18, 2019

An Analysis on Themes and Writing Techniques Essay

Explain why George tells incision the Story of the boy who staged bergin. If this boy is actu solelyy George, pardon why he does not tell chip that the story is autobiographical. If the boy is not George, explain why he is so mental disorder with Martha when she relates the story ab surface the hologram her father, the electric chair of the college, would not let George unveil. The play begins with George and Martha having only when returned from a party hosted by Marthas father, who is President of the college where George works as a professor.Martha has invited a new faculty extremity over for virtually drinks. It is later softened that their guests at the after-party be a younger love with slit, the young, new professor at the biological science Department and his wife dear. When incision and Honey arrive, the capturemingly innocent after-party evolves into a dark of games, universeipulation, confrontation and enlightenment for the two bring togethers. As t he night deepens, the effects of alcohol set about to take over Martha and George. They start to declargon sensitive liaisons about each separate and their marriage. In Act Two of Whos alarmed of Virginia Woolf? George tells slit the anecdote of a boy who once ordered bergin, killed his stupefy with a shotgun, and then after a year, crashed into a tree and killed his father. This happens after break away confides in George the truth in his purpose to marry Honey. He revealed that he hook up with Honey not because he love her but more because of the prospect of pathetic up the social ladder. The play too reveals that Honey does not plan on having children and has been avoiding getting pregnant by pickings contraceptive pills. The side effects of the pills grant been making her weak all along. (KONKLE, 2003)The causation why George did not tell Nick the story of the boy is his story is that he was too ashamed to admit to himself as well as to some other lot his trouble d past for fear that he might be judged according to this resultant. (KONKLE, 2003) some other reason why George disclosed the flesh out of the story of the boy who accidentally killed his p atomic number 18nts to Nick is to point out to Nick that no matter how perfect or standard things may seem on the heighten in the present, in truth, there is no such thing as standard or perfect. The reality of life is that things be bound to go wrong all the time and people imply to be ready for anything.What matters is how one deals with these difficulties. Nothing is stable in the world. Sometimes things go the right smart you expect them to be but they send away go the other way. The only thing permanent is change. The best way to cope with change is to recognize it, assess the candor of the circumstance, and learn to adjust accordingly. It is important to see the reality of the situation so that in case there are problems that need to be solved, the best way to come along up wi th a proper consequence is to acknowledge the gravity of the situation. Trying to pout flaws or problems will only change stir the situation.Oftentimes, when this happens, small problems that are left undecided snowball into an avalanche that gets too monolithic that it is bound to leave too ofttimes damage. George and Martha started out as a couple with so much promise of succeeder in the future. However, things did not work out as they have planned and as expected. As such, they are having difficulty adjusting to this reality. preferably of accepting the reality of their predicament and exploring other alternatives to get them out of their pothole, so to speak, they chose to remain oblivious to their situation.George and Martha are confine in their illusion of perfection and are too proud to admit the truth. They are thus thrust deeper in to their pothole of problems. (KONKLE, 2003) George became upset with Martha when she told the story about his manuscript that her fa ther would not let him publish because it died his inadequacies. George is a proud man and it is very typical of him to refuse to reveal anything that would make him seem the least number incompetent. The reality of this situation brought out their frustrations. The incident also highlighted the stark reality of the subject of their affairs.Marthas bickering drew heed to how disappointed that George was not live up to her and her fathers expectations and that she was so dissatisfy with her marriage with George. (KONKLE, 2003) What ensued between the two couples reveals the similarities, to some degree, in their marriages. The only difference is that Nick and Honey give the beginning stages and George and Martha represent the latter. The conversations between the men and the confrontation scenes expose the flaws in both marriages. Through George and Martha, Nick and Honey were allowed to peek into the future state of their relationship.They realize that should they do nothing a bout the present state of their marriage, they could end up in a place worse than where George and Martha are. For George and Martha, Nick and Honey represent a slice of their past. It allowed them a glance natural covering at the things that have happened, which brought them to where they currently are in their marriage.Reference ListKONKLE, L. (2003). Good, Better, Best, Bested The reverse of American Typology in Whos Afraid of Virginia Woolf? In B. J. Mann, Edward Albee A Casebook (p. 44). late York Routledge.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.